nolanimrod on April 14th, 2012

Every once in a while you come upon a phrase which makes under­stand­ing Super String The­ory seem like a walk in the park. I came upon a sen­tence like that in a piece at the Atlantic Wire Web­site.

New York Times colum­nist Nicholas Kristof’s Jan­u­ary 25 col­umn, “How Pimps Use the Web to Sell Girls,” estab­lished pretty con­vinc­ingly that the erotic-​​services adver­tis­ing web­site owned by Vil­lage Voice Media was used to pro­mote pros­ti­tu­tion, and often vio­lent and usu­ri­ous forms of the practice.

Let’s pick out one word: usu­ri­ous… prac­tic­ing usury.

OK. Usury then.  Usury:  the lend­ing of money at exor­bi­tant inter­est rates.

Well, I sup­pose we are talk­ing about lend­ing here. You have the use of cer­tain of the prostitute’s body parts, usu­ally until one or more of your body parts cries Hooray! or Uncle.

Nicholas Kristoff and The Atlantic have declared some of these prices usu­ri­ous. What would we do with­out experts to school us in the proper price of poon­tang? What do you think?

To para­phrase Freud: How much does woman want?

UPDATE: Another county heard from: Secret Ser­vice Agents “stiff” hooker.

Copy­right secured by Digiprove © 2012

Tags: experts, nookie

nolanimrod on April 12th, 2012

Win­ston Churchill once declared that, while he would not be so boor­ish so as to accuse a polit­i­cal oppo­nent of lying, he might say the fel­low was guilty of a ter­mi­no­log­i­cal inex­ac­ti­tude.

The phrase came fre­quently to mind when lis­ten­ing to the last few Obama speeches about the Supreme Court and the Ryan plan for a bud­get. Lis­ten­ing to him seri­ally pick a topic, define it as some­thing wildly unlike what it actu­ally was, often defin­ing it as its exact oppo­site, and doing it with such intense earnest­ness put me in mind of The Music Man, or one of his for­bears, the col­or­ful pitch­men of the late, great, wild west med­i­cine shows.

Well, dear friends, I was wrong and I am here to admit it. Obama hasn’t been tak­ing ora­tory lessons from such peo­ple as the pro­pri­eter of the folk rem­edy Hada­col whose inven­tor, when pressed about what, exactly, it was good for replied that it was good for sev­eral mil­lion dol­lars.

We know that it was Sen­a­tor Harry Reid who first pressed Obama to run for pres­i­dent and here you can see the gen­e­sis of the President’s style of ter­mi­no­log­i­cal inex­ac­ti­tude in this reply by Reid’s staff to a genealogist’s dis­cov­ery that Harry’s ances­tor had been hanged for hoss-​​stealing and train robbing.

As the old Right Guard com­mer­cial had it:

Never let ‘em see you sweat.

 

Copy­right secured by Digiprove © 2012

Tags: rhetorical flourishes

nolanimrod on April 8th, 2012

 

Copy­right secured by Digiprove © 2012

Tags: Freedom

nolanimrod on April 6th, 2012

Poor Barack. Reduced to par­rot­ing old lines over and over and over again.

This can result in some­thing come­di­ans call dying. It ain’t pretty.

 

Per Valerie Jar­rett: always the smartest per­son in any room. Too smart, really, to be fully engaged in the busi­ness of gov­ern­ing. The ques­tion arises: if some­one is that smart wouldn’t the fruits of that mas­sive smart­ness make such supe­ri­or­ity evi­dent, obvi­at­ing the neces­sity of hav­ing one’s menials pro­claim it at every opportunity?

 

Copy­right secured by Digiprove © 2012

Tags: dead parrot, smartest guy