Any­body who ever had to deal with a junkie knows the drill.

You just HAVE to let me have this wad of dough because I HAVE to get a suit /​ car /​ diploma in order to get that spe­cial job /​ award /​ open­ing that I need to turn my life around and if I don’t get it I’ll just die!

And then, of course, things pro­ceed with the crush­ing reg­u­lar­ity of the tolling of a bell. The wad of cash dis­ap­pears and in its place there is no new suit /​ car /​ diploma. There is just the knowl­edge that you have been vis­ited by the Homework-​​Eating Dog. A genial sort of pet, really, one who will sit in the closet, never need­ing food or water or a walk, just wait­ing until it’s needed, when it will slink out, put its tail between its legs, and con­fess to eat­ing the wad of dough just like it cheer­fully con­fessed to eat­ing that book report on Call of the Wild for Mrs. Markham’s 5th grade class.

You knew the dog was due for a visit, didn’t you, when you heard the politi­cians telling you that you had to cough up a tril­lion dol­lars for infra­struc­ture projects or the coun­try was going to just die!

And now it seems that the infra­struc­ture tril­lion, passed in a great rush because we couldn’t afford to wait, never got to where it was sup­posed to go. That’s what the Gov­er­nor of Penn­syl­va­nia says.

It’s the same with the state of the country’s infra­struc­ture. Con­sider some of these “grades,” as reported in the Amer­i­can Soci­ety of Civil Engi­neers’ most recent infra­struc­ture report card: tran­sit, D; energy, D+; dams, D; bridges, C; avi­a­tion, D; drink­ing water, D-​​; haz­ardous waste, D; schools, D; and waste­water, D-.

I’d say this defines our infra­struc­ture sit­u­a­tion as one in crisis.

Over a year after the infra­struc­ture stim­u­lus was passed.  No men­tion of it. Why do you sup­pose that it? Could it be because all that money is gone? Has the Homework-​​Eating Dog devel­oped a taste for stim­u­lus money?

Mark Steyn pro­vides what just might be a clue.

The other day, wend­ing my way from Woodsville, N.H., 40 miles south to Ply­mouth, I came across sev­eral “stim­u­lus” projects — every few miles, and her­alded by a two-​​tone sign, a hith­erto rare sight on Gran­ite State high­ways. The orange strip at the top said “PUTTING AMERICA BACK TO WORK” with a sil­hou­ette of a man with a shovel, and the green part under­neath informed you that what you were about to see was a “PROJECT FUNDED BY THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT.” There then fol­lowed a few yards of des­o­late, aban­doned, scar­i­fied pave­ment, fol­lowed by an “END OF ROAD WORKS” sign, until the next “stim­u­lus” project a cou­ple of bends down a quiet rural blacktop.

Admit­tedly it would be help­ful to have spent some years in Chicago or New Orleans (the NOLA Nim­rod expe­ri­enced both) to under­stand what some­thing like that means. It means the money, if it was ever there, is gone.

That’s why you should prob­a­bly read the entire plaint of the Gov­er­nor of Penn­syl­va­nia. Because not only are the tril­lion infra­struc­ture bucks down the gul­let of the Homework-​​Eating Dog, but the Gov­er­nor of Penn­syl­va­nia still wants what those bucks were sup­posed to do.  So the econ­omy wasn’t stim­u­lated, the infra­struc­ture wasn’t mod­ern­ized, but the money to do both has been spent and it will have to be paid off by the next two generations.

Was that the change we were wait­ing for?

Copy­right secured by Digiprove © 2010

Tags: debt, infrastructure, junkie government, stimulus

7 Comments to “The Homework-​​Eating Dog Develops a Taste for Highways, Pipes, and Bridges”

  1. Ike Jakson says:

    Nim­rod

    You have a well informed Post with plenty of body and facts that can­not be refuted.

    Why don’t these clowns kick Rahm’s ass and put you in there.

    • nolanimrod says:

      This is the one where I said, Hey! I thought we were friends! Were I to replace Rahm it would mean that I would have to spend every minute — wak­ing, sleep­ing, on the john, what­ever — bust­ing my brain try­ing to make Saint Obama’s lat­est effort to thor­oughly screw up Amer­ica and the other places where Free­dom still peeks out from time to time seem like good things. A cou­ple of weeks of that and I’d prob­a­bly look like him: bags under my eyes down to my knees.

      I’ve known guys like Obama. They are so inse­cure that they have to prove their supe­ri­or­ity with every word, every deed, and do it with a super­cil­ious hau­teur that is pretty funny when viewed from a dis­tance (à la Dan Ackroyd’s rich, snotty moron in Trad­ing Places) but it’s no fun to work for.

      Besides, I’d be inclined to try and mit­i­gate some of the dam­age and I’m not sure that would be a good thing in the long run. I think it might be good that the coun­try see the results is of all those feel-​​good slo­gans when you actu­ally do them.

      So rec­om­mend­ing me for Rahm’s replace­ment is doing me no favor, I assure you.

  2. Ike Jakson says:

    Nim­rod

    Nim­rod

    Don’t be so mod­est. I liked the “sec­ond effort and left a comment.

    And this made me remem­ber; what do I have to do from my side to sub­scribe to receive Gmail noti­fi­ca­tions of your new Posts in my Inbox as well as new com­ments. I would like to see more com­ments in your Posts and will adver­tise your Blog when I am back from the cave again. I am leav­ing again in the morn­ing if the weather holds to try and get a guinea fowl for my birth­day on Tues­day. Do read my lat­est Post:

    http://ikejakson.wordpress.com.….-red-wine/

    • nolanimrod says:

      So I guess this means that you are back from your cave. From the tone of the writ­ing I thought it was going to be much more Robin­son Cru­soe than it was.

      To get entire posts by email or through a reader just click on the syn­di­ca­tion sym­bol ( and it will give you the choice to use a syn­di­ca­tion ser­vice and a reader or to get posts in your email in box.

      What does a guinea fowl taste like? I have had pheas­ant, Gambel’s Quail, dove, wild duck, wild goose, and wild turkey, but no idea what a guinea fowl tastes like (were it not for the Inter­net I would have no idea what a Guinal fowl looks like; now I know they look like some­thing I believe is called a cas­sowary). If prop­erly cooked, mean­ing slowly over a smokey fire with fre­quent bast­ing, wild turkey is pos­si­bly the finest thing I ever put into my mouth. At least the finest thing that I chewed up and swallowed.

  3. ikejakson says:

    Hi Nim­rod

    Have I said some­thing wrong? Of course we are friends, and I hap­pen to hold the opin­ion that it is always a good time at any­time and for what­ever rea­son to kick Rahm in the ass.

    I like it to see the com­ment com­ing in via my Google Inbox. It gives me two ways to respond though I think I sub­mit­ted the same response twice to another guy the other day when I used the Reply func­tion in Gmail and when it didn’t show in the Post imme­di­ately I posted it straight in there as well.

    Do let me know please.

    Have you since also received my enquiry about how I go about things to sub­scribe to all your new Posts and com­ments fol­low­ing on that?

    I hope to tell you soon about a Sodbuster’s Luck for an invi­ta­tion to come over and select any two guinea fowls to bag for my birth­day next Tuesday?

  4. ikejakson says:

    Thanks Nim­rod

    You are right about Rahm; one should be care­ful when drag­ging HIM INTO ANYTHING.

    The Sod­buster [yours truly] will [all going well] have two guinea fowl for his birth­day. To be confirmed.

    But your Posts only show my com­ments mak­ing it look as if I am talk­ing to myself, and that will invite my Kenya/​Rhodesian/​British/​Russian/​now Cyprus friend Bravo to brand me as insane over the World Wide Net. It’s nice and very con­ve­nient to get your response to my com­ment in my Gmail Inbox but I am con­cerned about utter and com­plete ful­fill­ment and great hap­pi­ness for my Friend Bravo, see.

    • nolanimrod says:

      And quite right you are, Sir Sod­buster (may I call you Sod? How about Auld Sod?). You are truly not talk­ing to your­self, although that is often times the only way it is pos­si­ble to have an intel­li­gent con­ver­sa­tion, espe­cially if you are talk­ing to one of the men­tal tod­dlers who usu­ally go by some name or other, usu­ally fol­lowed by ist.

      I began blog­ging mainly to keep from annoy­ing friends whose e-​​mailboxes would be chock full every morn­ing with things I had read that they just must see and some of them were get­ting a mite huffy.

      Then I started at MyT and then got into my own hosted Word­Press blog and I was get­ting really into it, set­ting myself goals on the num­ber of reads for the month, stuff like that, and then the lib­er­als and their fel­low use­less idiots got a bit much for me.

      Thus depressed I started doing less blog­ging less and then started just being lazy. When ever you leave a com­ment it goes to my email in box and I can reply from there rather than from the blog and that is what I have been doing. Just lazy.

      But you are right. There isn’t much point to hav­ing half a dis­cus­sion out in the open ant the other pri­vate, espe­cially if it addresses some­thing which might be of gen­eral interest.

      So — color me newly aware of the wider duties of being a mem­ber of the blo­gos­phere and will I not shirk them again.

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>