I greatly admire Ramesh Pon­nuru, but some­times I worry that he gets just a wee bit eso­teric in dis­cussing pos­si­ble shifts and vagaries in the tides, cur­rents, and occa­sional St. Elmo’s Fire that go hand in hand with votes in a mess like this when every­body involved from the rul­ing party has for­got­ten what the orig­i­nal goal was.

If Sen­a­tor Webb of Vir­ginia votes against the bill, for exam­ple, doesn’t that increase the pain of a yes vote for the three vul­ner­a­ble House Democ­rats from that state? And the same logic applies to sev­eral other states.

Oh. Wait. Never mind. Sorry. We need to worry about this. And, as for the 300 mil­lion Amer­i­cans that these peo­ple are rip­ping the futures away from so that they can give their lawyer bud­dies or their union bud­dies or their Wall Street bud­dies a wink-​​wink, well, screw them.

So I guess if it can’t be put in those terms it must come down to which rep­re­sen­ta­tive is going to feel pain as a result of the sen­a­tor from his state hav­ing reversed his vote.

Copy­right secured by Digiprove © 2010

Tags: Mandarins

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>