Days of Our Lives

October 2009
S M T W T F S
« Sep   Nov »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
  • memoir, n.: OED Word of the Day
    Today's word from the OED has the following earliest quotation: 1494 Loutfut MS f. 42, in Dict. Older Sc. Tongue at Memor(e, And giff {ygh}e wil wit mair hereof demand [etc.]..for it that is here writtin is bot a memour for to demand & for to lere. That he be forgewin that has maid this memoir. […]

He’s Baa-ack…

from National Review

There may be some prece­dent for a mod­ern White House’s attempt­ing to use the machin­ery of the pres­i­dency to destroy a critic in this fash­ion, but Barack Obama did not run as the Second Coming of Richard Nixon.

———————–

Nixon’s Plumbers went after infor­ma­tion and planted rumors about peo­ple using dis­hon­est and ille­gal means.  In a bliz­zard of irony that would daz­zle the writer O’Henry the Obama machine went after a real plumber,  Joe Wurzelbacher,  in an effort to, er, plumb (sorry) the depths of Wurzelbacher’s pri­vate life, just like Nixon’s Plumbers invaded the offices of Daniel Ellsberg’s psy­chi­a­trist try­ing to get some dirt on him.

———————–

The White House is going after Rush Limbaugh, a pri­vate cit­i­zen, because of what he says.  This must not happen.

Back in the day there was an effort afoot to get pub­lic school teach­ers to sign loy­alty oaths.  The effort against this was led by the ACLU and I joined them because of that effort (I unjoined when they started send­ing oper­a­tives to high school foot­ball games to see if the place kicker crossed him­self before attempt­ing a field goal, but that’s another story).  The whole thing was not-so-subtle intim­i­da­tion to force peo­ple to get their minds, or at least their words, right.

I don’t see a lot of dif­fer­ence between those loy­alty oaths and Obama’s Rat-Out-Your-Neighbor web site.

Do you?

While there have been some humor­ous moments to this episode of Get Limbaugh, like Chris Matthews talk­ing about killing Limbaugh by using some kind of spe­cial spy-assassination device (yeah-right!  Like Matthews could prop­erly oper­ate a Cracker jack prize), or CNN and MSNBC at times being described as “News Organizations,” but the under­ly­ing issue is a seri­ous one.

And besides… Barack.  James.  Paul.   And all the rest of the gang.   Isn’t there some­body else?  Somebody who maybe isn’t an American behav­ing in a con­sti­tu­tion­ally pro­tected man­ner that you might tar­get your arrows at?

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>