I just learned that Hillary, in her open­ing cam­paign bar­rage, com­plained about too much of the wrong kind of money in politics.

I can’t believe that she chose to go there, but, since she has, so shall I.

Any­body remem­ber White­wa­ter? I know — it’s so yes­ter­day (and let’s talk about the dress). Well, guess what? All the dress did was prove that Bill Clin­ton had been lying (who knew?).

Another thing that was proved was that Bil­lary were bor­row­ing money for their White­wa­ter project that was find­ing its way into Bill’s cam­paign for Gov­er­nor of Arkansas. That’s about a dozen sep­a­rate, felo­nious crimes.

But we never heard (and never will) in the Demo­c­rat News Agency one thing about it.

So, since Hillary has decided, in spite of being dead broke, to run for Pres­i­dent, I thought I would give you a lit­tle hint on how to read the news items com­ing from Hillaryland .

A Japan­ese man was inter­viewed about the news peo­ple on the home islands got and whether they could get any idea from it of what was going on.

Oh, yes, he said. It was easy. As the war pro­gressed the Glo­ri­ous Vic­to­ries of the Impe­r­ial Japan­ese Fleet kept get­ting closer and closer to home.

Digiprove sealCopy­right secured by Digiprove © 2015

Tags: Bill Clinton, campaign finance, Hillary, Whitewater

nolanimrod on April 15th, 2015

The Obama News Agency (aka The New York Times) informs us that

Obama Yields, Allow­ing Con­gress Say on Iran Nuclear Deal

Isn’t that all inclu­sive and tol­er­ant of him? Allow­ing the Sen­ate a say in a mat­ter with which it is con­sti­tu­tion­ally charged with over­sight? Don’t worry, Oba­malots: this means no more than the other road­blocks our feck­less leg­is­la­ture has thrown up in The Won’s path, as we see if we read down to para­graph four where the Times, entirely for­get­ting itself and try­ing to act like a news jour­nal, tells us this:

The essence of the leg­is­la­tion is that Con­gress will have a chance to vote on what­ever deal emerges with Iran — if one is reached by June 30 — but in a way that would be extremely dif­fi­cult for Mr. Obama to lose …

Note: before pro­ceed­ing with my deft and pen­e­trat­ing analy­sis of this deal let me hit the point that is obvi­ous to any­one famil­iar with Obama’s Lucy with the foot­ball tac­tics: a deal must be reached by June 30 for the Sen­ate bill to apply; what’s to keep Lucy Obama from extend­ing the con­fer­ence period one day or one week, thereby mak­ing the Senate’s work, as Nixon used to say, inop­er­a­tive?

As the arti­cle pro­gresses we see the spoor of Lucy Obama again in para­graph five:

But if it rejected the agree­ment, Mr. Obama could veto that leg­is­la­tion — and it would take only 34 sen­a­tors to sus­tain the veto, mean­ing that Mr. Obama could lose upward of a dozen Demo­c­ra­tic sen­a­tors and still prevail.

See what he did there? 34 Sen­a­tors?  Obama can get 34 sen­a­tors to do any­thing he wants just so long as it is bad for Amer­ica (I stip­u­late this exclu­sion because he can’t get 34 Sen­a­tors to go along with the Fast-​​Track trade autho­riza­tion because that might be good for Amer­ica and, well, you know, they’re Democrats).

Mean­while, back at the ranch, the Rus­sians have paused their inva­sion of Ukraine to decide to send anti-​​aircraft mis­siles to the Ira­ni­ans as their com­ment on the future of Amer­i­can sanctions.

As a final note, I just wish to point out that I have pro­vided this some­what half-​​witted exe­ge­sis of the New York Times story from the lat­est install­ment of The Impor­tance of Being (Josh) Earnest:

We’ve gone from a piece of leg­is­la­tion that the pres­i­dent would veto to a piece of leg­is­la­tion that’s under­gone sub­stan­tial revi­sion such that it’s now in the form of a com­pro­mise that the pres­i­dent would be will­ing to sign,” Mr. Earnest said. “That would cer­tainly be an improvement.”

You fig­ure it out.

 

Digiprove sealCopy­right secured by Digiprove © 2015

Tags: global thermonuclear war, Iran, Obama

nolanimrod on April 11th, 2015

Once upon a time I was with a group of peo­ple in Chicago that got a lit­tle liquored-​​up and decided to go out for din­ner at a lit­tle neigh­bor­hood place serv­ing Lebanese food. We were all seated, the drinks ordered, the menus scru­ti­nized, the orders given, the food deliv­ered, the eat­ing begun when the telling of sto­ries commenced.

Many of us had answered Soup to the Soup or Salad ques­tion because the restau­rant offered a delight­ful Mid­dle East­ern ver­sion fea­tur­ing lamb meat­balls and we had just started on the savory del­i­cacy as one girl, prompted by the float­ing meat­balls, related a story about chil­dren float­ing pieces of bread for the ducks in the Lin­coln Park Lagoon.

That moved another mem­ber of the group to launch into a dis­ser­ta­tion about her gall blad­der operation.

And the funny thing, she said, was that with­out the stuff secreted by the gall blad­der all your turds float.

Did I men­tion that the meat­balls were savory?

Well, appar­ently, when I.R.S. employ­ees relate tales of derring-​​do in which they ambush peo­ple by freez­ing their bank accounts and tak­ing their pos­ses­sions with­out any prior notice or ben­e­fit of a court order they get a reac­tion sim­i­lar to that of our group to the gall blad­der story.

And they feel really bad about it.

Digiprove sealCopy­right secured by Digiprove © 2015

Tags: IRS, Taxes, Unappreciated

nolanimrod on March 25th, 2015

Remem­ber Toto? Dorothy’s lit­tle dog who pulled the cur­tain back to show the fear­some Oz to be a fussy lit­tle fat man? We could use him now. Per­haps he could per­form the same ser­vice on our media which keeps using words and phrases like rape and gang-​​rape which, viz. Inigo Mon­toya, they keep using but seem not to know what they mean.

It seems only fair to feed you the back­story since our own NY Sen­a­to­r­ial Sock Pup­pet is hang­ing onto the rape thing like grim Death and get­ting pretty good at it. One of her recent instal­la­tions was drag­ging the Mat­tress Girl along with her to Obama’s last State of the Union.
 
The real treat is Mark Steyn’s exquis­ite fram­ing of the cur­rent media cli­mate in which it is OK to describe as soul­less sav­ages and bru­tal gang-​​rapists a group of peo­ple who did noth­ing wrong because they were white, male, mid­dle class and to pre­tend another group of men who beat and tore the clothes off a girl before gang-​​raping her in the street were just wisps of fog, unreal, because they were not white, not mid­dle class, not Americans.
Digiprove sealCopy­right secured by Digiprove © 2015

Tags: the narrative